About Team Contact
Medical AI

Rewriting the Limits of Medicine

Where deep cellular insight meets real-time clinical action

The future of care isn't just treating disease, it is preventing the systemic decay that causes it. Harnessing real-time predictive models, AI decodes vast streams of patient data in milliseconds. Doctors can see what human eyes miss, turning reactive treatments into proactive, lifelong protection.

Heart

Congenital Heart Disease Detection

Medical AI · Cardiology

Seeing What
Hearts Hide

Deep learning meets echocardiography — our AI parses ultrasound signals in real time, flagging structural defects the eye might miss. Early. Precise. Actionable.

0
% Accuracy
0
Sec Detection
0
CHD Types
🔊Echo Probe
──▶
📡Signal
──▶
🧠AI Model
──▶
📋Report
+ve 0 −ve
AI Diagnosis
DefectASD Type II
SeverityModerate
EF%62%
HR74 bpm
Confidence0%
Transducer
2.5 MHz · A4C View
Clinician Verified
2cm 4cm 6cm 8cm SVC IVC Ao PA PV LV RV LA RA ASD ↗
ASD Detected

Congenital heart disease affects roughly 1 in 100 live births, and early, accurate detection materially changes surgical outcomes. Most diagnostic AI in this space is trained to answer a narrow question in isolation: is this view normal or abnormal. We build the full pipeline instead, from raw echocardiography acquisition through view classification, structural measurement, and surgical outcome prediction, so a clinician gets a single coherent read rather than a stack of disconnected model outputs to reconcile themselves.

Our models are developed with clinicians trained at MIT and Harvard, published in peer-reviewed venues supported by the NIH and the American Heart Association, and validated against real surgical outcomes, not just retrospective image labels. That grounding matters in a clinical setting: a system used in fetal and perinatal cardiology has to be explainable to the physician making the call, auditable after the fact, and precise enough that its output changes a real decision rather than adding another dashboard to check.

Research Pipeline

How Our AI Works

01
Fetal Echo & Perinatal Diagnosis
End-to-end AI pipeline from image acquisition to clinical outcome prediction
Image Acquisition
Guided sonography optimization
Auto Measurement
Cardiac structure sizing
Outlier Detection
Anomaly flagging
CHD Classification
ASD · VSD · TOF · CoA
Outcome Prediction
Risk stratification
02
Automated View Classification & Segmentation
Deep learning steps through recognition, segmentation, and diagnosis
VIEW CLASSIFIER INPUT A4C PLAX PSAX SUBC CONFIDENCE SCORES A4C 94% PLAX 40% PSAX 20% SUBC 9% PREDICTION ✓ A4C — Apical 4-Chamber Confidence: 94.3% · Latency: 12 ms DEEP LEARNING VIEW CLASSIFIER
Standard view recognition

The model identifies which echocardiographic view is being captured — A4C, PLAX, PSAX, subcostal — enabling downstream algorithms to apply view-specific analysis without operator labelling.

CNN classifier 4 standard views Real-time
SEGMENTATION MASK LV LA RV RA AUTO-MEASUREMENTS LV Vol 88 mL RV Vol 74 mL Wall T. 9.2 mm EF% 62% U-NET MULTI-STRUCTURE MASK
Cardiac structure segmentation

A segmentation model delineates all four chambers simultaneously — LV, RV, LA, RA — enabling precise automated measurement of volumes, wall thickness, and chamber dimensions throughout the cardiac cycle.

U-Net architecture 4-chamber mask Frame-by-frame
CHD DETECTION OUTPUT ASD ↗ Atrial Septal Defect VSD Ventricular Septal DETECTION CONFIDENCE ASD 94.7% VSD 71.2% TOF 8.1% MULTI-LABEL CHD CLASSIFIER
Automated CHD flagging

The diagnostic head runs multi-label classification across CHD types — ASD, VSD, Tetralogy of Fallot, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, coarctation of aorta — returning confidence scores and localised bounding boxes for each suspected defect.

Multi-label Bounding box TOF · HLHS · CoA
03
Functional Assessment & Risk Prediction
From ventricular metrics to outcome modelling and phenotypic clustering
Functional Metrics
EF%
62%
RV strain
−18%
LV Vol
88 mL
TAPSE
14 mm
ML Risk Model
Input layer
Hidden ×3
Attention
Output
Predictions
RV failure risk
Moderate ▲
Post-surgical EF
58–65%
Phenotype cluster
Group B · Fontan
Unsupervised phenotypic clustering — CHD population
Group A · ToF Group B · Fontan Group C · ASD/VSD Group D · HLHS
Every heartbeat tells a story. We listen with AI.
FDA-grade pipeline
Real-time inference
ASD · VSD · TOF · CoA
04
The Detection Gap
Why so many congenital heart defects are still found after birth, not before

The national average prenatal detection rate for congenital heart disease sits close to 50 percent. Some defects are caught almost every time. Others are missed far more often, not because clinicians are careless, but because a standard four chamber screening view simply cannot show every lesion.

Why detection rates vary so widely by defect
  • The lesion sits outside the standard view. A routine anatomy scan checks a four chamber view of the heart. Defects that only become visible from an outflow tract or great vessel view, such as coarctation of the aorta or transposition, are structurally harder to catch on a first pass.
  • The defect changes shape over the pregnancy. Some lesions, including coarctation, can look mild or even normal early on and only become clearly abnormal later, so timing of the scan matters as much as skill.
  • Access to a detailed scan is uneven. Not every expecting parent reaches a center with dedicated fetal cardiac imaging, and the gap widens further in lower resource and rural settings.
  • Interpretation still depends on a trained eye. Reading a fetal echocardiogram accurately takes years of specialized experience, and that expertise is unevenly distributed across hospitals and regions.

This is the gap AI assisted screening is built to close. It does not replace the standard four chamber view. It adds a second, tireless set of eyes that never skips a frame, flags the views that are hardest for humans to catch consistently, and applies the same threshold every time, regardless of how late in the day or how busy the clinic is.

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome
~100%
Overall CHD average
~50%
Coarctation of the aorta
~18%
Transposition of the great arteries
~9%
The gap is not only clinical. Rural residence, public insurance status and higher poverty areas are each independently associated with lower prenatal detection rates, meaning where a family lives can shape whether a defect is caught in time.
05
What the Evidence Shows
Independent studies on AI assisted echocardiographic diagnosis

Claims about AI in medicine are easy to make and hard to verify. The numbers below come from a pooled 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis covering seven independent studies and nineteen datasets of AI assisted fetal echocardiographic image analysis, not from a single vendor's internal testing.

93%
Sensitivity across 7 pooled studies detecting fetal CHD
93%
Specificity across the same pooled meta-analysis
What sensitivity and specificity actually mean here
  • Sensitivity of 93 percent means that out of every 100 fetal hearts with a real congenital defect, the AI system correctly flags roughly 93 of them, missing about 7. That is the number that matters most for catching a defect before birth.
  • Specificity of 93 percent means that out of every 100 healthy fetal hearts, the system correctly clears roughly 93 of them, avoiding unnecessary alarm for the great majority of normal pregnancies.
  • Both numbers together describe a screening tool, not a final diagnosis. A flagged case is a prompt for closer specialist review, in the same way a positive result on any screening test would be.
In separate work on automated ejection fraction measurement, the disagreement between a deep learning model and expert readers was smaller than the disagreement found between different expert readers on the same study. The model was not just fast. It was more consistent than the clinicians it was measured against.
06
Beyond the Specialist's Office
Extending cardiac imaging to places a specialist rarely reaches

People living in rural and remote areas have the lowest access to cardiac imaging. AI guided point of care ultrasound lets a non-expert operator capture diagnostic quality images, close to 80 percent of the time on standard views, without a sonographer on site.

Harder views remain more variable, so this does not replace specialist interpretation. It extends where a first, reliable image can be taken at all, directly addressing the access gap described in the previous section.

How this changes a real visit
  • A local nurse or midwife can capture the scan. AI guidance shows the operator, in real time, how to angle and hold the probe to reach a standard diagnostic view, closing most of the skill gap that used to require a trained sonographer in the room.
  • The image travels, not the patient. Once a diagnostic quality image is captured, it can be reviewed remotely by a specialist, removing the need for a family to travel hours to a cardiac center just to get a first look.
  • Harder views still need a specialist. Apical windows and other more difficult angles remain more variable in quality, so this approach is best understood as a wider net for catching problems early, with confirmation still resting on expert review.
  • It builds directly on Section 04. The same rural and lower resource areas shown earlier to have lower prenatal detection rates are the ones this kind of guided imaging is best positioned to reach first.